Income Distribution : Definition and Basis of Theories
Browse articles:
Auto Beauty Business Culture Dieting DIY Events Fashion Finance Food Freelancing Gardening Health Hobbies Home Internet Jobs Law Local Media Men's Health Mobile Nutrition Parenting Pets Pregnancy Products Psychology Real Estate Relationships Science Seniors Sports Technology Travel Wellness Women's Health
Browse companies:
Automotive Crafts, Hobbies & Gifts Department Stores Electronics & Wearables Fashion Food & Drink Health & Beauty Home & Garden Online Services & Software Sports & Outdoors Subscription Boxes Toys, Kids & Baby Travel & Events

Income Distribution : Definition and Basis of Theories

Income distribution is the allocation of income among the owners of the factors of production. Theories of income distribution are based on 4 elements : Marginal productivity, Needs, Social Usefulness, Equality.

Income distribution is the allocation of income among the owners of the factors of production. There are various ideas or theories of income distribution. The early social philosophers crusaded not only for economic equality but also for social and political equality. For instance, the French philosopher Rousseau contended that private property was robbery and it did not exist in the state of nature. Another social performer, Babeuf stated that nature has given to every man an equal right in the enjoyment of all goods. Likewise, Proudhon, a believer in equality and bitter enemy of private property, claimed that employers robbed laborers by not rendering to them the full value of their labor. In the case of Karl Marx, he said that the capitalist is a recipient, of surplus value or profit. He claimed further that the capitalist, in the process of accumulating wealth for himself, therefore robs and exploits the worker.

The maldistribution of income and wealth among the less-developed countries has been more widespread. The gap between the rich and the poor is getting wider and wider. Only very few are rich while most of the people exist under the poverty line.

Basis of the Theories of Income Distribution

In view of the extreme poverty in the less developed regions of the world which has emanated from unjust distribution of wealth and income not a few countries have charged or changed or modified their economic systems in the hope of improving the social and economic conditions of their peoples. They have introduced radical economic, social and political reforms to uplift the masses from their miserable conditions. This means there is a redistribution of wealth and income based on social and economic justice.

Several theories of income distribution are based on the following :

1. Marginal productivity – holds that the income of the factor of production is equal to the value of its marginal product. This is simply means that the owners of the factors of production are paid based on their contribution to production under a competitive market condition. However, there are government laws to comply with, and that the market is not perfectly competitive. Another, capitalists have another idea of income distribution.

2. Needs – determine the amount of income of families or individuals. Those who have more needs receive more incomes in proportion to their needs. Some countries, especially the highly developed ones, have been using this theory of income distribution. They provide allowances to the children of their employees.

3. Social Usefulness – is the basis of income distribution. Jobs which are more useful to society are paid higher. Jobs under this category are teachers, farmers, fishermen, doctors, and nurses. Such theory encounters difficulties in implementation. Singers, actors, comedians, and other groups are most likely to oppose such social usefulness theory of income distribution.

4. Equality – refers to an income distribution in which all members of society receive an equal amount of income. This is the idea of communism in an attempt to erase the gap between the rich and the poor. Such theory is good to other but not to all. Those who are lazy and those who have little qualifications are happy under this arrangement. However, those who are highly qualified and ambitious are discouraged or demoralized. Consequently, both economy and society will not progress for lack of economic incentives to deserving individuals.


Additional resources:

Need an answer?
Get insightful answers from community-recommended
in Marketing and Branding on Knoji.
Would you recommend this author as an expert in Marketing and Branding?
You have 0 recommendations remaining to grant today.
Comments (1)

Very well-explained!